Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II, argues that regionalism and a parliamentary system are not the solutions to Nigeria’s issues, advocating for unity and accountable governance instead.
Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II, has asserted that regionalism and a parliamentary system of government are not the solutions to Nigeria’s problems. In an interview with Vanguard, Sanusi questioned the necessity of a bicameral legislature and the rationale behind appointing ministers from every state, which he believes contributes to bureaucratic inefficiencies without serving the nation’s best interests.
Sanusi criticized the federal government’s interference in state matters, particularly concerning traditional and chieftaincy affairs. He emphasized the importance of upholding constitutional principles and maintaining a clear separation of powers to ensure accountable governance.
The Emir noted that regionalism could exacerbate existing issues in the country rather than resolve them. He called for a more cohesive national identity and governance structure that promotes unity and accountability.
Sanusi’s perspective challenges the current political discourse, urging Nigerians to focus on creating a unified and efficient governance system rather than reverting to regionalism or adopting a parliamentary system.
He said;
“I think there are several things we can do to address those structures because at the end of the day if you allow the state governors to run, the thing with devolution is we have 36 states, if only half of the governors are good, at least half of Nigeria has a good government. There is too much power at the centre, too much of the resources. The centre does not do primary education or primary healthcare, and that is where the vast majority of Nigerians are. Shouldn’t those resources come to the state? Instead of everybody going to Abuja, what is happening in Abuja? There are several issues that we need to look at. And also simple constitutionalism and federalism, just even the respect of separation of separation of power. If you take the example of what is happening in Kano today, chieftaincy matter is 100 per cent a state matter.
“We had a parliamentary system in the First Republic. What happened? At the end of the day, it is the humans that operate the system. People talk about regions. Initially, the regions we had in this country were North, East, and West, and then it became NorthEast and MidWest. Where did the creation called six geo-political zones come from historically? We can keep dividing and subdividing this country and thinking of ourselves, but are we really honest? Are these regions?
“If you go to the Niger Delta, since when did the Itsekiri stop fighting wars against the Ijaw? Since when did we become homogeneous?
“It was the Sokoto Jihad that brought us together. From the Sokoto caliphate, we became Northerners, from Northerners, we became Nigerians. When I was in King’s College, I grew up under Yakubu Gowon in a country where Nigerians were thinking like Nigerians. What happened? Political leadership is the one that exploits regional and ethnic identities as part of the struggle for political office.
“When they get there, they all sit together. If you look at the president’s cabinet, what do you have? You have everybody from every state. You have Christians, you have Muslims, you have Northerners and Southerners. Why are they not fighting one another in there? The elites are irresponsible.
“Don’t think that pandering to these elites by saying the solution is going to a regional system of government. How do we go regional? In Yorubaland, there are Ijebu, Ekiti, Ijesha, Owo, and Egba since when did they become one? Right there between Ife and Modakeke, they were killing each other. It is not about that. It is not a solution. How many parts are you going to slice this country to get a homogenous country? How? With all the intermarriages and education, I am not sure that is a solution, and I think people have this dream that can only be sold by blocking out history.
“We had a regional system in the First Republic. How did it end? We had a parliamentary system in the First Republic. How did it end? I am not talking about the coup; I am talking about the crisis that led to the coup. Before Nzeogu, forget Ironsi. How was the system before they came? Is there any documentary evidence that that system was fundamentally better than what we have?
