Victory for Nnamdi Kanu? CJN Intervenes, Reassigns Case To New Judge

Nnamdi Kanu’s legal team has secured a reassignment of his case to a new judge, following the intervention of the CJN. The development comes after Justice Binta Nyako indefinitely adjourned proceedings over claims of bias. Get full details.

The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court (FHC), Justice John Tsoho, has reassigned the case against the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, to a new judge following prolonged legal battles over alleged judicial bias. This decision comes after the intervention of the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, in response to appeals from Kanu’s legal team.

Kanu, who has been in custody since 2021 following his controversial extradition from Kenya, is facing a seven-count charge of treasonable felony brought against him by the Federal Government. The reassignment of his case marks a significant development in the long-standing legal battle that has drawn both national and international attention.

The case was previously presided over by Justice Binta Nyako, who indefinitely adjourned proceedings on February 10 after Kanu’s legal team demanded her withdrawal due to alleged partiality. Despite the initial refusal by the Chief Judge to reassign the case, persistent legal representations from Kanu’s counsel, Mr. Alloy Ejimakor, ultimately led to a reversal of that decision.

Confirming the development, Ejimakor disclosed that the judiciary’s leadership had acted on their formal request for a lawful reassignment of the case. He praised Justice Kekere-Ekun for her intervention, emphasizing the importance of a fair trial for his client.

Reacting to the new turn of events, Kanu expressed his readiness to defend himself in court, maintaining his innocence against the allegations. His legal team stated that the previous judicial hurdles had posed a serious threat to his constitutional rights, particularly his right to a fair and speedy trial.

“To be clear, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has always been prepared to take his trial because he is firmly convinced of his innocence. However, the judicial challenges of the past six months raised significant concerns about due process,” Ejimakor said.

According to him, their decision to challenge Justice Nyako’s continued handling of the case was driven by the need to uphold legal integrity. While appreciating the reassignment, Ejimakor, however, declined to disclose the identity of the new judge assigned to the matter.

Kanu’s legal troubles date back to his first arrest on October 14, 2015, upon his return to Nigeria from the United Kingdom. He was granted bail on health grounds on April 25, 2017, but later fled the country following a military raid on his Afara Ukwu Ibeku residence in Abia State. The operation resulted in casualties among his followers, further escalating tensions between IPOB supporters and the government.

In June 2021, he was apprehended in Kenya and forcefully returned to Nigeria in a move widely condemned as extraordinary rendition. Since then, he has remained in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS), with multiple legal battles challenging the government’s actions.

Over the years, courts have issued conflicting rulings on Kanu’s case. In April 2022, the Federal High Court struck out eight of the 15 charges against him, citing lack of merit. Later, in October 2022, the Court of Appeal ordered his immediate release and dismissed all charges, a decision that the Federal Government successfully challenged at the Supreme Court.

In December 2023, the Supreme Court reversed the appellate court’s ruling, giving the government the legal backing to continue Kanu’s prosecution on the remaining seven counts.

With a new judge now set to handle the case, all eyes remain on the judiciary as Kanu’s trial progresses. His supporters and legal team are hopeful that the reassignment will ensure a more transparent and unbiased legal process, paving the way for a final resolution to the protracted case.