Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kenneth Ahia, has closed his defamation case against Ikechukwu Iroha. Court proceedings saw a key witness testify, while the defendant was absent. The case has been adjourned to March 18, 2025, for pending motions and cross-examination. Read full details.
In a significant development in the ongoing defamation lawsuit between Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Kenneth Ahia and Ikechukwu Iroha, the claimant officially closed his case today, February 11, 2025. The case, which has drawn widespread public attention, was heard in court today, with a crucial witness giving testimony before the presiding judge adjourned proceedings to March 18, 2025.
During the brief session, Barrister Wilson Kalu, a witness for Ahia, adopted his witness statement on oath. He confirmed that he has been friends with Ikechukwu Iroha, who reportedly changed his name to Ikechukwu Iroha Agwu in October 2023. The witness further stated that he continues to receive social media posts from Iroha, including as recently as this morning.
The defense counsel, representing Iroha, conducted a cross-examination, focusing on the witness’s ability to verify social media activities. The lawyer notably asked Barrister Kalu if he worked for Facebook, implying doubts about his ability to authenticate online activities.
A striking observation in today’s session was the absence of the defendant, Ikechukwu Iroha. His non-appearance adds another layer of intrigue to the high-profile case. Following the claimant’s submission, the court adjourned the case to March 18, 2025, when pending motions will be addressed and the defendant is expected to be cross-examined.
The defamation lawsuit was filed by Kenneth Ahia, SAN, against Ikechukwu Iroha over allegations of malicious and false publications made by the defendant. The legal battle has been ongoing, with each hearing uncovering fresh dimensions to the matter.
With the next court date set, all eyes will be on Ikechukwu Iroha as legal proceedings take a decisive turn. Will he finally appear for cross-examination? Will the court rule in favor of Ahia? The coming weeks promise more revelations in this high-stakes defamation case.