A major legal battle erupts as Dr. Monday Ubani’s lawyers reject claims linking him to Malami. Click to read the full explosive details.
A fresh legal storm is brewing in Nigeria’s already volatile media and political space as the law firm representing Dr. Monday O. Ubani, SAN, has issued a blistering response to what it describes as a reckless, malicious and court-defying publication by controversial writer Tonye Clinton Jaja.
In a strongly worded press response signed by Nkem Okoro, Esq., Ubani’s solicitor, the firm accused Jaja of deliberately dragging their client into an imaginary criminal narrative involving former Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, SAN, without presenting a single shred of evidence.
According to the statement, Ubani has never had any professional, financial, administrative or personal dealings with Malami, nor has he ever been connected to any of the allegations being circulated in Jaja’s publication.
“Mere mention of a person’s name in a criminal narrative without particulars is neither evidence nor public interest disclosure. It is character assassination and abuse of media space,” the lawyers declared.
Even more damning is the revelation that Jaja is already operating under a subsisting court order restraining him from publishing any further defamatory materials against Ubani. Yet, despite this, he allegedly continues to churn out what the lawyers describe as sensational and malicious publications in open contempt of the court.
The statement makes it clear that both civil and criminal proceedings are already in motion against Jaja and that his latest publication only worsens his legal exposure.
Legal experts observing the case say this transforms the matter from mere defamation into a potential contempt of court crisis — a far more serious legal offence.
By attempting to link Ubani to Malami, a former power-broker in the Buhari administration, Jaja’s publication appears designed to create the illusion of a high-level scandal. Ubani’s legal team says this was done deliberately to poison public perception and generate media frenzy, not to present facts.
They insist that if Jaja has any real evidence, the courtroom — not the media — is the proper place to present it.
Ubani’s lawyers have vowed that every further defamatory publication will attract escalated legal consequences, signaling that this is no longer a warning but a full-scale legal offensive.
As the drama unfolds, observers say this case could become a landmark battle over media responsibility, defamation, and the abuse of public platforms for personal vendettas.



